THE UNION OF INDIA vs M M MATHIALAGEN — HCBM20033742025

Case under The Central Administrative Tribunal Section 227. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020033742025

e-Filing Number

31-01-2025

Filing Number

WP/3371/2025

Filing Date

31-Jan-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED U/S 986

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Central Administrative Tribunal Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. Vaishali Choudhari

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL FILMS

    Adv. VAISHALI MUKUND CHOUDHARI

  3. 3.UNION PUBLICE SERVICE COMMISSION

    Adv. VAISHALI MUKUND CHOUDHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M M MATHIALAGEN

  2. 2.P RAJENDRAN

  3. 3.K S SHRIDHAR

  4. 4.PRATIBHA KAUR PASRICHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    This document does not contain a judgment on the merits of the case. It is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court's Prothonotary dated May 6, 2026, rejecting multiple petitions (WPL/561/2019 and others) for office objections. The court gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to cure defects and comply with filing requirements; failure to do so will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 31-Jan-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This document does not contain a judgment on the merits of the case. It is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court's Prothonotary dated May 6, 2026, rejecting multiple petitions (WPL/561/2019 and others) for office objections. The court gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to cure defects and comply with filing requirements; failure to do so will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case