Malati Nihala Singh vs The Dy Collector (ENC) and Competent Authority — HCBM20033092025

Case under Constitution of India Section Article 226. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM020033092025

e-Filing Number

30-01-2025

Filing Number

WP/3307/2025

Filing Date

31-Jan-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Article 226
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Malati Nihala Singh

    Adv. AVYAAN LEGAL

  2. 2.Ratnesh Nihala Singh

    Adv. AVYAAN LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Dy Collector (ENC) and Competent Authority

  2. 2.M/s Gold Coin Builder

  3. 3.Meena Mahendra Gala

  4. 4.The Pride Of Vakola (SRA) CHS LTD

  5. 5.Kripashanker Singh

  6. 6.Shivpujan D Singh

  7. 7.Mahendra D Singh

  8. 8.Jagdish Waman Puthra

  9. 9.Shailesh Nihala Singh

  10. 10.Vandana Dinesh Singh

  11. 11.Jyoti Jaiprakash Singh

  12. 12.Nikhilesh Nihala Singh

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted the petitioners (Malati Nihala Singh and Ratnesh Nihala Singh) a final extension until 19.06.2026 to remove office objections and get their Writ Petition registered, with the warning that failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  4. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  5. 31-Jan-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted the petitioners (Malati Nihala Singh and Ratnesh Nihala Singh) a final extension until 19.06.2026 to remove office objections and get their Writ Petition registered, with the warning that failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case