INTERCON CONSTRUCTIONS (I) PVT LTD CIVIL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT vs THE SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY — HCBM20033052025
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020033052025
Filing Number
WP/3303/2025
Filing Date
31-Jan-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INTERCON CONSTRUCTIONS (I) PVT LTD CIVIL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Adv. LAW ORIGIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
2.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (SPECIAL CELL) WESTERN SUBURB, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
3.ANITA RADHAKRISHNA SHETTY
-
4.BHARAT SRA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING (PROP)
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The High Court of Bombay granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections on nine writ petitions and obtain registration/numbering by filing compliance praecipe on or before April 15, 2026. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all writ petitions under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jul-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
09-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
03-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
03-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2025
Case filed
The High Court of Bombay granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections on nine writ petitions and obtain registration/numbering by filing compliance praecipe on or before April 15, 2026. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all writ petitions under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts