SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs RAMBALI H YADAV — EXA/1818/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020031752024
Filing Number
EXA/3174/2024
Filing Date
29-Jan-2024
Registration No
EXA/1818/2025
Registration Date
09-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)
Adv. adv amol shinde
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMBALI H YADAV
-
2.UDAYBHAN SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 902-1151) involving Shriram Finance Limited, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from the new timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
29-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1818/2025
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in multiple consolidated cases (Serial Nos. 902-1151) involving Shriram Finance Limited, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from the new timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts