GIRISH MUNSHI VISHWAKARMA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER, — HCBM20029962026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020029962026
Filing Number
IA/2996/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIRISH MUNSHI VISHWAKARMA
Adv. SAGAR P BATAVIA
-
2.SUBHAVATI MUNSHI VISHWAKARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER,
-
2.COMPETENT AUTHORITY -3 SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
3.ASST. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER K/WEST WARD,
-
4.A.H. CONSTRUCTIONS
Case History
-
23-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Interim Application
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
10-Jun-2026
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
The Bombay High Court issued an order on June 10, 2026, regarding multiple writ petitions (including WP(L)/15844/2025 and others) that had office objections. The court gave the petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and comply with O.S. Rule 986 by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks, failing which all writ petitions and interim applications would stand rejected for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Interim Application
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
23-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
The Bombay High Court issued an order on June 10, 2026, regarding multiple writ petitions (including WP(L)/15844/2025 and others) that had office objections. The court gave the petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and comply with O.S. Rule 986 by filing a compliance praecipe within two weeks, failing which all writ petitions and interim applications would stand rejected for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts