Gajanan Keshav Dhople vs Keshav Vaijanath Dhople — TP/1709/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020029232026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/2923/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

TP/1709/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gajanan Keshav Dhople

    Adv. Mr. Pravin D. Kadam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Keshav Vaijanath Dhople

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Summary: In testamentary petition 35 TP/1709/2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case was called for direction on 15th April 2026. The Court directed the office to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff, Mumbai, and ordered the advocate to file affidavits of service and furnish an Administration Bond as per Rules 399-400. The matter stands adjourned pending compliance with procedural requirements and verification of any cross petitions, with liberty to re-list after all formalities are completed for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1709/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In testamentary petition 35 TP/1709/2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case was called for direction on 15th April 2026. The Court directed the office to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff, Mumbai, and ordered the advocate to file affidavits of service and furnish an Administration Bond as per Rules 399-400. The matter stands adjourned pending compliance with procedural requirements and verification of any cross petitions, with liberty to re-list after all formalities are completed for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case