Jaseem Manihara Store Through its Proprietor Md Jasim vs Manoj Gosai — IA/1376/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 51. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020029182026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
IA/2918/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
IA/1376/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jaseem Manihara Store Through its Proprietor Md Jasim
Adv. PRASHANT KASHINATH AHER
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manoj Gosai
-
2.Jintendra Kumar Goswami Proprietor of Goswami General Stores
-
3.Saroj Gosai proprietor of Saroj Trading
-
4.Gajendra Kumar Sah
-
5.Pari General Stores
-
6.Manoj Kumar Purbe proprietor of Pushpanjali General Stores
-
7.Vijay Kumar Das Proprietor of Vijay Manihari Store
-
8.Prawin Kumar Proprietor of Simran Praveen Kumar
-
9.Chandan Kumar Proprietor of Aaradhna Shringaar
-
10.Munna Manihari
-
11.Pariwar Shringar
-
12.Kesari Manihari AKA Ashish Kumar Kesari
-
13.Sarvan Manihari Aka Shravan Poddar
-
14.Ashok Kumar Proprietor of Sumit Shringar Gift House
-
15.Vicky Kumar Proprietor of Vicky General Stores
-
16.Krishna Kumar Proprietor of Suhag General Stores
-
17.Shyam Sundar Prasad Proprietor of Soni Shringar
-
18.Shrawan Gosai Proprietor of AKA Shrawan Gami Shrawan General Store
-
19.Surender Singh Maniyar
-
20.Gautam Kumar Saha Proprietor of Gautam General Stores
-
21.Sunil Proprietor of Sunil Stores
-
22.Dhananjay proprietor of Dhananjay UIP Ladies Corner
-
23.Ajay Kumar Patwa UIP Corner
-
24.Bitu Kumar Gupta
-
25.Dilip Patwa
-
26.Tabrez Alam proprietor of New Varities Ladies Corner
-
27.Chandan Kumar Proprietor of Chandan Cosmetics
-
28.Prem Kumar Proprietor of Rajesh VIP Ladies Corner
-
29.Kanhaiya Shringar
-
30.Priy Joshi proprietor of Ladlee Shringar
-
31.Arvind Kumar Proprietor of Mahalaxmi Shringar
-
32.Nagoji Manihari
-
33.Sitaram Mahto
-
34.Marico Limited
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court granted Jaseem Manihara Store's application to condone a 101-day delay in filing its written statement in a trademark infringement suit by Marico Limited. The court accepted the defendant's explanation that, as a small retail shop operator, it struggled to understand English-language court proceedings and required time to engage legal counsel. Since the written statement was filed within the outer 120-day limit and the defendant's status as a small retailer was relevant, the delay was condoned and the application was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/1376/2026
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court granted Jaseem Manihara Store's application to condone a 101-day delay in filing its written statement in a trademark infringement suit by Marico Limited. The court accepted the defendant's explanation that, as a small retail shop operator, it struggled to understand English-language court proceedings and required time to engage legal counsel. Since the written statement was filed within the outer 120-day limit and the defendant's status as a small retailer was relevant, the delay was condoned and the application was allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts