Tata Capital Limited KATARIYA LAW ASSOCIATES LLP vs Abhishek Enterprises — ARBAP/60/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020029032026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
ARBAP/2903/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
ARBAP/60/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tata Capital Limited KATARIYA LAW ASSOCIATES LLP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abhishek Enterprises
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
The Bombay High Court appointed Ms. Pooja Gera as sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes between Tata Capital Ltd. and Abhishek Enterprises arising from their loan-cum-guarantee agreement dated December 4, 2024. The court confirmed the existence of a valid arbitration clause (Clause 13) with Mumbai as the seat of arbitration, and directed both parties to bear arbitrator fees equally while all substantive issues remain open for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARBAP/60/2026
The Bombay High Court appointed Ms. Pooja Gera as sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes between Tata Capital Ltd. and Abhishek Enterprises arising from their loan-cum-guarantee agreement dated December 4, 2024. The court confirmed the existence of a valid arbitration clause (Clause 13) with Mumbai as the seat of arbitration, and directed both parties to bear arbitrator fees equally while all substantive issues remain open for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts