MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. vs OPAL ASIA(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED — EXA/1534/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020027462024

Filing Number

EXA/2745/2024

Filing Date

25-Jan-2024

Registration No

EXA/1534/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.

    Adv. Ashok Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OPAL ASIA(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

  2. 2.AJITH MENON

    Adv. JAMSHED ANSARI

  3. 3.ANURADHA MENON

    Adv. JAMSHED ANSARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/1534/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 902-1151) after finding that sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. All related commercial execution and interim applications were dismissed, with the court permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the prior invocation period for limitation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 25-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1534/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/1534/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 902-1151) after finding that sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. All related commercial execution and interim applications were dismissed, with the court permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the prior invocation period for limitation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case