SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs TUKARAM SAHEBRAO KHARADE — EXA/1099/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020026612024

Filing Number

EXA/2660/2024

Filing Date

24-Jan-2024

Registration No

EXA/1099/2025

Registration Date

15-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TUKARAM SAHEBRAO KHARADE

  2. 2.RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 commercial applications and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of the void arbitration from limitation calculations, unless the parties have a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 24-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1099/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 commercial applications and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of the void arbitration from limitation calculations, unless the parties have a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case