SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED vs SUJIT KUMAR KRISHNA PILLAI — EXA/197/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020026432026
Filing Number
EXA/2641/2026
Filing Date
23-Jan-2026
Registration No
EXA/197/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED
Adv. adv amol shinde
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUJIT KUMAR KRISHNA PILLAI
-
2.RAJLAXMI TRAVELS PROP SELVARAJ ARJUN MUDALIYAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (including EXA/197/2026 involving Shriram Finance Limited) on the grounds that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all execution and connected applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
23-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/197/2026
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (including EXA/197/2026 involving Shriram Finance Limited) on the grounds that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all execution and connected applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts