FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED ACUMEN LAWYERS FIRM vs S K FACILITY SERVICES — EXA/527/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020025222024

Filing Number

EXA/2520/2024

Filing Date

23-Jan-2024

Registration No

EXA/527/2024

Registration Date

21-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FEDBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED ACUMEN LAWYERS FIRM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S K FACILITY SERVICES

  2. 2.JAGDISH KISAN KEREKAR (CO-APP

  3. 3.SUNANDA JAGDISH KEREKAR (CO-APP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of prior proceedings from limitation calculations, unless express written waivers exist under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 23-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/527/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of prior proceedings from limitation calculations, unless express written waivers exist under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case