L AND T FINANCE LIMITED vs HARENDRA CHHAGANBHAI PATEL AND ANR. — EXA/543/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020025112015
Filing Number
EXA/172/2015
Filing Date
28-Jan-2015
Registration No
EXA/543/2015
Registration Date
02-Mar-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED
Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARENDRA CHHAGANBHAI PATEL AND ANR.
-
2.CHHAGANBHAI S/O MAKANBHAI PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple execution applications, including EXA/543/2015 (L&T Finance v. Harendra Chhaganbhai Patel), finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Following Supreme Court precedent in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding prior limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
28-Jan-2015
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/543/2015
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple execution applications, including EXA/543/2015 (L&T Finance v. Harendra Chhaganbhai Patel), finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Following Supreme Court precedent in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding prior limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts