L AND T FINANCE LIMITED vs MR. RIYAZ MAHFUZ AHMAD AND ANR. — EXA/545/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020024962015

Filing Number

EXA/170/2015

Filing Date

28-Jan-2015

Registration No

EXA/545/2015

Registration Date

02-Mar-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. RIYAZ MAHFUZ AHMAD AND ANR.

  2. 2.MR. ASIF AHMED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple execution applications, including Execution Application No.545/2015 (L & T Finance Ltd. v. Riyaz Mahfuz Ahmad), after finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which the court held void ab initio following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period from the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 28-Jan-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/545/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple execution applications, including Execution Application No.545/2015 (L & T Finance Ltd. v. Riyaz Mahfuz Ahmad), after finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which the court held void ab initio following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period from the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case