MANASI DESAI AND ANR (CAVEATOR) vs KALPANA UDESHI ALIAS @ Kalpana Harendrakumar Kalpana Harendrakumar Udeshi, — CTS/211/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 31. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020022962026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2026
Filing Number
CTS/2296/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
CTS/211/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION WITH WILL ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANASI DESAI AND ANR (CAVEATOR)
Adv. Jayesh Desai and Associates
Tanvi Udeshi
Adv. JAYESH V DESAI
Respondent(s)
KALPANA UDESHI ALIAS @ Kalpana Harendrakumar Kalpana Harendrakumar Udeshi,
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | FOR REJECTION UNDER RULE 986 |
Orders
Case Summary: CAVEAT (L) NO. 2296 OF 2026 Court: Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction) Parties: Caveators Manasi Desai and Anr. v. Petitioner Kalpana Udeshi (in matter of deceased Mavjee Purshottam Udeshi) Order (April 17, 2026): The court accepted a 48-day delay in filing the affidavit of the second caveator (residing in London) and accepted it as lodged. The affidavit was taken on record under Rule 402 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980, with dispensation from Rule 402 requirements. The praecipe was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CAVEAT (L) NO. 2296 OF 2026 Court: Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction) Parties: Caveators Manasi Desai and Anr. v. Petitioner Kalpana Udeshi (in matter of deceased Mavjee Purshottam Udeshi) Order (April 17, 2026): The court accepted a 48-day delay in filing the affidavit of the second caveator (residing in London) and accepted it as lodged. The affidavit was taken on record under Rule 402 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980, with dispensation from Rule 402 requirements. The praecipe was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts