MANASI DESAI AND ANR (CAVEATOR) vs KALPANA UDESHI ALIAS @ Kalpana Harendrakumar Kalpana Harendrakumar Udeshi, — CTS/211/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 31. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020022962026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2026
Filing Number
CTS/2296/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
CTS/211/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION WITH WILL ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANASI DESAI AND ANR (CAVEATOR)
Adv. Jayesh Desai and Associates
-
2.Tanvi Udeshi
Adv. JAYESH V DESAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALPANA UDESHI ALIAS @ Kalpana Harendrakumar Kalpana Harendrakumar Udeshi,
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: CAVEAT (L) NO. 2296 OF 2026 Court: Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction) Parties: Caveators Manasi Desai and Anr. v. Petitioner Kalpana Udeshi (in matter of deceased Mavjee Purshottam Udeshi) Order (April 17, 2026): The court accepted a 48-day delay in filing the affidavit of the second caveator (residing in London) and accepted it as lodged. The affidavit was taken on record under Rule 402 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980, with dispensation from Rule 402 requirements. The praecipe was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CTS/211/2026
Case Summary: CAVEAT (L) NO. 2296 OF 2026 Court: Bombay High Court (Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction) Parties: Caveators Manasi Desai and Anr. v. Petitioner Kalpana Udeshi (in matter of deceased Mavjee Purshottam Udeshi) Order (April 17, 2026): The court accepted a 48-day delay in filing the affidavit of the second caveator (residing in London) and accepted it as lodged. The affidavit was taken on record under Rule 402 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980, with dispensation from Rule 402 requirements. The praecipe was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts