BHAVNA NAVINCHANDRA SHAVDIA BEING C A of i to iv vs NAVIN CHANDRA ZAVERCHAND SHAVDIA — HCBM20022952026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 234. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020022952026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/2295/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 234

Petitioner(s)

BHAVNA NAVINCHANDRA SHAVDIA BEING C A of i to iv

Adv. Meena Rajesh Sharma

KAMLESH NAVINCHANDRA BEING CA of i to iv

Adv. SHARMA MEENA RAJESH

Respondent(s)

NAVIN CHANDRA ZAVERCHAND SHAVDIA

DineshChandra Zaverchand Shavdia

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

12-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Case Summary Testamentary Petition (L) No. 2295 of 2026 | High Court of Bombay | 12 June 2026 The Court waived the Testamentary Department's objection regarding the absence of a joint Will for both deceased brothers (Navinchandra and Dineshchandra Zaverchand Shavdia). The petitioner sought letters of administration for a Will dated 11 September 1975, noting that Kenyan courts had already issued letters of administration and probate for both brothers' estates. The Court directed the Department to proceed with the matter subject to removal of other objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Testamentary Petition (L) No. 2295 of 2026 | High Court of Bombay | 12 June 2026 The Court waived the Testamentary Department's objection regarding the absence of a joint Will for both deceased brothers (Navinchandra and Dineshchandra Zaverchand Shavdia). The petitioner sought letters of administration for a Will dated 11 September 1975, noting that Kenyan courts had already issued letters of administration and probate for both brothers' estates. The Court directed the Department to proceed with the matter subject to removal of other objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case