PRABHA P. SHENAI (SR. CITIZEN) THROUGH C.A. PRAKASH R. SHENAI (APPLICANT) vs HARENDRA SINGH BISHT AND ANR. Advocate - Bimal Rajasekhar — IA/995/2021
Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 433, 434. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020022792021
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
IA/2267/2021
Filing Date
22-01-2021
Registration No
IA/995/2021
Registration Date
23-04-2021
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPANY LAW, MRTP AND ALLIED ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRABHA P. SHENAI (SR. CITIZEN) THROUGH C.A. PRAKASH R. SHENAI (APPLICANT)
Respondent(s)
HARENDRA SINGH BISHT AND ANR. Advocate - Bimal Rajasekhar
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR
INTERIM APPLICATION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-08-2021 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 13-03-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 17-04-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
| 06-02-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
| 30-01-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
Orders
Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay found that Interim Application (L) No. 3877 of 2026 was not filed in the required format and lacked proper averments. The court ordered that both Interim Application (L) No. 3876 of 2026 and No. 3877 of 2026 be taken up for hearing after proper numbering and formatting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay found that Interim Application (L) No. 3877 of 2026 was not filed in the required format and lacked proper averments. The court ordered that both Interim Application (L) No. 3876 of 2026 and No. 3877 of 2026 be taken up for hearing after proper numbering and formatting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts