Suyash Virkar vs Raghunath Dinkar Virkar — TP/2559/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020022302026

e-Filing Number

21-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/2230/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

TP/2559/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suyash Virkar

    Adv. Ayodhya Patki

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raghunath Dinkar Virkar

  2. 2.Laxman Dinkar Virkar

  3. 3.Vasant Dinkar Virkar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2559/2026 Summary: The Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) called the petition for directions on 9th June 2026. The case was adjourned with the court directing the petitioner's advocate to: issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per the prescribed rules, and verify for any cross petitions. Liberty was granted to relist the matter after compliance is complete and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2559/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2559/2026 Summary: The Bombay High Court (Testamentary Registrar) called the petition for directions on 9th June 2026. The case was adjourned with the court directing the petitioner's advocate to: issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per the prescribed rules, and verify for any cross petitions. Liberty was granted to relist the matter after compliance is complete and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case