HEMANT KESHAV PRASAD SHARMA Gaurav K Gadodia vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/1659/2026

Case under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Section 34. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020021802026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

WP/2180/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/1659/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

VALUE ADDED TAX ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Value Added Tax Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANT KESHAV PRASAD SHARMA Gaurav K Gadodia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.STATE TAX OFFICER C 910

Case History

  1. 29-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jul-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/1659/2026 Petitioner Hemant Keshav Prasad Sharma challenged a property attachment order dated November 6, 2025, issued by the State Tax Officer. The High Court of Bombay issued notice to respondents (State of Maharashtra and State Tax Officer), returnable July 29, 2026, and directed the respondents to file a reply. The court clarified that if respondents initiate any coercive action, the petitioner may seek urgent relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1659/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/1659/2026 Petitioner Hemant Keshav Prasad Sharma challenged a property attachment order dated November 6, 2025, issued by the State Tax Officer. The High Court of Bombay issued notice to respondents (State of Maharashtra and State Tax Officer), returnable July 29, 2026, and directed the respondents to file a reply. The court clarified that if respondents initiate any coercive action, the petitioner may seek urgent relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case