MCTS RAJIV GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY vs THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE GRIEVANCE CELL — WP/1218/2026

Case under Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020021742026

Filing Number

WP/2174/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

WP/1218/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Single

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MCTS RAJIV GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

    Adv. V M PARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE GRIEVANCE CELL

  2. 2.DHYANESHWAR J DHANGAR

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 1218 of 2026 filed by MCTS Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology against the Grievance Redressal Committee, University of Mumbai was heard on 12th June 2026 before Justice Gautam A. Ankhad. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on 1st July 2026 at the petitioner's advocate's request. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1218/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 1218 of 2026 filed by MCTS Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology against the Grievance Redressal Committee, University of Mumbai was heard on 12th June 2026 before Justice Gautam A. Ankhad. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on 1st July 2026 at the petitioner's advocate's request. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case