PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 MUMBAI vs INTERM BOARD OF SETTLEMENT Bhagwati Group matter — WP/2312/2026
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 226,245D[4]. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020021382025
e-Filing Number
20-01-2025
Filing Number
WP/2137/2025
Filing Date
20-Jan-2025
Registration No
WP/2312/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 1 MUMBAI
Adv. Akhileshwar Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.INTERM BOARD OF SETTLEMENT Bhagwati Group matter
-
2.Bhagwati Developers
-
3.Shanti Enterprises
-
4.Patel Enterprises
-
5.Shree Bhagwati Enterprises
-
6.Patel Developers
-
7.Shri Hari Enterprises
-
8.Bhagwati Infra
-
9.Saisha Developers
-
10.Manji Karman Patel
-
11.Bhogilal Mavji Vora
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay granted the petitioner a final extension until 07.05.2026 to cure office objections and register/number the writ petition. If compliance is not achieved by the deadline, the petition shall stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
20-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2312/2026
CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay granted the petitioner a final extension until 07.05.2026 to cure office objections and register/number the writ petition. If compliance is not achieved by the deadline, the petition shall stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts