MALA SHRENIK MEHTA AND ANR. /APPLICANTNANDLAL KANAYALAL TALREJA ...PETITIONING CREDITOR. vs MALA SHRENIK MEHTA ANR. — HCBM20020812026

Case under Presidency Towns Insolvancy Act 1909 Section 13. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020020812026

Filing Number

NMIS/2081/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Presidency Towns Insolvancy Act 1909 Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALA SHRENIK MEHTA AND ANR. /APPLICANTNANDLAL KANAYALAL TALREJA ...PETITIONING CREDITOR.

    Adv. Mayur Vinod Faria

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALA SHRENIK MEHTA ANR.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Case Summary: In this insolvency matter before the Bombay High Court, the motion for annulment filed by debtors Mala Shrenik Mehta & Anr. was allowed. The Official Assignee confirmed that the petitioning-creditor Meena Kanayalal Talreja's claim had been fully satisfied, an indemnity bond was filed, and the Official Assignee's commission was paid. The motion was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Circulation (Insolvency)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this insolvency matter before the Bombay High Court, the motion for annulment filed by debtors Mala Shrenik Mehta & Anr. was allowed. The Official Assignee confirmed that the petitioning-creditor Meena Kanayalal Talreja's claim had been fully satisfied, an indemnity bond was filed, and the Official Assignee's commission was paid. The motion was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case