THE PR. CIT-2, KOLHAPUR vs JAMIR CHHOTE VYAPARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD. — ITXA/2666/2018
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020020802018
Filing Number
ITXA/157/2018
Filing Date
23-Jan-2018
Registration No
ITXA/2666/2018
Registration Date
08-Oct-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE PR. CIT-2, KOLHAPUR
Adv. N N Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAMIR CHHOTE VYAPARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of Income Tax Appeal No. 2666 of 2018 by allowing the appellant (Pr. CIT-2, Kolhapur) to withdraw the appeal, as the tax effect involved was below Rs. 2 crores, falling within the threshold of CBDT Circular No. 09/2024 dated September 17, 2024. The court kept the substantial questions of law open for decision in an appropriate proceeding and allowed refund of court fees if an application was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Oct-2020
For Admission
Provisional Board , Provisional Board
-
07-Sep-2018
Aniruddha M. Chandekar, Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
-
10-Aug-2018
Aniruddha M. Chandekar, Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
-
13-Jul-2018
Aniruddha M. Chandekar, Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
-
15-Jun-2018
Aniruddha M. Chandekar, Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
-
23-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. ITXA/2666/2018
The Bombay High Court disposed of Income Tax Appeal No. 2666 of 2018 by allowing the appellant (Pr. CIT-2, Kolhapur) to withdraw the appeal, as the tax effect involved was below Rs. 2 crores, falling within the threshold of CBDT Circular No. 09/2024 dated September 17, 2024. The court kept the substantial questions of law open for decision in an appropriate proceeding and allowed refund of court fees if an application was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts