SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. saikumar pathrudu m AND DEVENDDRA V NAWADKAR vs KAILASH GOVINDRAM BORA AND 2 ORS. — EXA/1730/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020020422021

Filing Number

EXA/2030/2021

Filing Date

20-Jan-2021

Registration No

EXA/1730/2023

Registration Date

30-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. saikumar pathrudu m AND DEVENDDRA V NAWADKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAILASH GOVINDRAM BORA AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.MAHESH M BORA

  3. 3.RENU KAILASH BORA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) on finding that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 20-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1730/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) on finding that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case