SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs OWAIS RAZRA MOHAMMED AMIN KHANIYA — EXA/1122/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020020232024

Filing Number

EXA/2023/2024

Filing Date

19-Jan-2024

Registration No

EXA/1122/2024

Registration Date

04-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Sub-Category

AWARDS ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. Sudhir Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OWAIS RAZRA MOHAMMED AMIN KHANIYA

  2. 2.JAVED AHMED MIYAN SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters involving Shriram Finance Limited against the respondents, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The Court dismissed execution applications and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 19-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1122/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters involving Shriram Finance Limited against the respondents, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The Court dismissed execution applications and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case