Meenakshi Satishchandra Upadhyay vs Satishchandra Rashbihari Upadhyay(Since Deceased) — HCBM20018682026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 273. Next hearing: 18th February 2026.
CNR: HCBM020018682026
Next Hearing
18th February 2026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
TP/1868/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Judge
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Coram
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meenakshi Satishchandra Upadhyay
Adv. Makrand Madan Kale
Abhijat Satishchandra Upadhyay
Adv. KALE MAKARAND MADAN
Respondent(s)
Satishchandra Rashbihari Upadhyay(Since Deceased)
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-02-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: In this testamentary petition filed by legal heirs Meenakshi Satishchandra Upadhyay and her brother (representing the deceased Satishchandra Rashbihari Upadhyay's estate), the Bombay High Court directed the concerned department to accept and confirm the Power of Attorney granted by the brother to his sister. The court ordered the department to return the original document and proceed further in accordance with law, while instructing that no objections be raised regarding the Power of Attorney if it is in proper order. The praecipe was disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this testamentary petition filed by legal heirs Meenakshi Satishchandra Upadhyay and her brother (representing the deceased Satishchandra Rashbihari Upadhyay's estate), the Bombay High Court directed the concerned department to accept and confirm the Power of Attorney granted by the brother to his sister. The court ordered the department to return the original document and proceed further in accordance with law, while instructing that no objections be raised regarding the Power of Attorney if it is in proper order. The praecipe was disposed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts