L AND T FINANCE LIMITED vs PRECISION ENGINEERS AND FABRICATORS PVT. LTD. AND 2 ORS. — CHS/81/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Sep-2018

CNR: HCBM020017602018

Filing Number

CHS/88/2018

Filing Date

20-Jan-2018

Registration No

CHS/81/2018

Registration Date

02-Feb-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. S. I. Joshi and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRECISION ENGINEERS AND FABRICATORS PVT. LTD. AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.RAVINDER PAL SINGH SAHNI

  3. 3.GURDEEP SINGH SAHNI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed L&T Finance Limited's execution application against Precision Engineers and Fabricators Pvt. Ltd., declaring the underlying arbitral award void-ab-initio because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral. Relying on a recent Supreme Court judgment, the court held that arbitral awards can be set aside even at the execution stage when the arbitrator's appointment violates procedural requirements. The parties were permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2025

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  5. 07-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2025

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  8. 17-Mar-2025

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  9. 18-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  10. 18-Feb-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  11. 14-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  12. 03-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  13. 15-Jan-2025

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  14. 13-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  15. 13-Nov-2024

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  16. 27-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  17. 29-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  18. 28-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  19. 28-Jun-2024

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  20. 22-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  21. 22-Apr-2024

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  23. 27-Mar-2024

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  25. 21-Mar-2024

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  26. 13-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  27. 13-Mar-2024

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  28. 13-Mar-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  29. 09-Feb-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  30. 06-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  31. 19-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  32. 17-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 20-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHS/81/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed L&T Finance Limited's execution application against Precision Engineers and Fabricators Pvt. Ltd., declaring the underlying arbitral award void-ab-initio because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral. Relying on a recent Supreme Court judgment, the court held that arbitral awards can be set aside even at the execution stage when the arbitrator's appointment violates procedural requirements. The parties were permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case