Shiv Prakash HUF And Ors S.MAHOMEDBHAI AND CO vs Sanjay Prakash — IA/533/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section Order6Rule16. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020017012026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
IA/1701/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
IA/533/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shiv Prakash HUF And Ors S.MAHOMEDBHAI AND CO
-
2.Benu S Prakash
Adv. S.MAHOMEDBHAI AND CO
-
3.Akshay A Kapur
Adv. S.MAHOMEDBHAI AND CO
-
4.Ishan A Kapur
Adv. S.MAHOMEDBHAI AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanjay Prakash
-
2.Ajay Prakash
-
3.A S Prakash And Bros
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Interim Application
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
Case Summary: IA/533/2026 The Bombay High Court heard an interim application seeking to strike out portions of the defendant's written statement that allegedly included without-prejudice mediation communications. The court declined to decide the matter immediately and instead called for a reply from the respondents within two weeks, with a rejoinder permitted within one week thereafter. The case was adjourned to June 19, 2026, with pleadings to be completed in the related interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
At 11.00 A.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/533/2026
Case Summary: IA/533/2026 The Bombay High Court heard an interim application seeking to strike out portions of the defendant's written statement that allegedly included without-prejudice mediation communications. The court declined to decide the matter immediately and instead called for a reply from the respondents within two weeks, with a rejoinder permitted within one week thereafter. The case was adjourned to June 19, 2026, with pleadings to be completed in the related interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts