LALLUBHAI AMICHAND LTD. vs THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MUMBAI ( — WP/2253/2025
Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 28th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020016742025
Filing Number
WP/1674/2025
Filing Date
17-01-2025
Registration No
WP/2253/2025
Registration Date
24-06-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LALLUBHAI AMICHAND LTD.
Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO
Respondent(s)
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MUMBAI (
CITY
DUN CO.OP. HOUSING SOC. LTD.
Adv. AUROMA LAW
NANDKISHORE LALBHAI MEHTA
MALKA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PRAKASH TOLAT
SURESH OCHHAVAL SHAH
PANKAJ N. MEHTA
Adv. pravin mehta mithi co
N.L. MEHTA (HUF)
MALKA SHAH
Adv. pravin mehta mithi co
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-02-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 11-03-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 22-01-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-04-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 20-03-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/2253/2025 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition on 28th April 2026 through an amicable settlement between Lallubhai Amichand Ltd. and the respondents. The court accepted the Consent Terms signed by both parties and treated the undertakings contained therein as undertakings to the court, disposing of the petition without any order as to costs and vacating all interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/2253/2025 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition on 28th April 2026 through an amicable settlement between Lallubhai Amichand Ltd. and the respondents. The court accepted the Consent Terms signed by both parties and treated the undertakings contained therein as undertakings to the court, disposing of the petition without any order as to costs and vacating all interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts