Kiritbhai Babubhai Patel vs Bijal Nalinkumar Patel — HCBM20016442026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 263. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020016442026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
MPT/1644/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
REVOCATION PETITION ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiritbhai Babubhai Patel
Adv. Carl Adale Patel
Respondent(s)
Bijal Nalinkumar Patel
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
MISC. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF GRANT
MISC. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF GRANT
MISC. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF GRANT
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS-1
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-01-2026 | MISC. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF GRANT |
| 30-01-2026 | MISC. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF GRANT |
| 06-02-2026 | MISC. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF GRANT |
| 09-02-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS-1 |
| 13-02-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
Orders
Case Summary Kiritbhai Babubhai Patel v. Bijal Nalinkumar Patel The Bombay High Court (Judge Milind N. Jadhav) heard two interim applications in testamentary petitions on April 23, 2026. The court found that HDFC Bank's Santacruz (West) Branch had not complied with directions issued in a previous order dated February 27, 2026. The court directed the Branch Manager to immediately comply with those directions, warning of contempt proceedings if non-compliance continues. The case was adjourned to May 4, 2026 for compliance verification, with the Branch Manager required to appear in court unless the bank complies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Kiritbhai Babubhai Patel v. Bijal Nalinkumar Patel The Bombay High Court (Judge Milind N. Jadhav) heard two interim applications in testamentary petitions on April 23, 2026. The court found that HDFC Bank's Santacruz (West) Branch had not complied with directions issued in a previous order dated February 27, 2026. The court directed the Branch Manager to immediately comply with those directions, warning of contempt proceedings if non-compliance continues. The case was adjourned to May 4, 2026 for compliance verification, with the Branch Manager required to appear in court unless the bank complies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts