RESHMA HARI APTE @ RESHMA CHAITANYA BHIDE vs SUNITA PRABHAKAR LIMAYE AND 2 ORS — S/12/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020015942020

Filing Number

S/63/2020

Filing Date

21-Jan-2020

Registration No

S/12/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RESHMA HARI APTE @ RESHMA CHAITANYA BHIDE

    Adv. Amin Pratik Prabhakar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA PRABHAKAR LIMAYE AND 2 ORS

    Adv. DEF. NO. 1 AND 3 1123

  2. 2.AMITA ABHAY GOGATE

    Adv. DEF. NO. 1 AND

  3. 3.AJIT P. LIMAYE

    Adv. DEF. NO. 1 AND 3

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Case S/12/2026 Summary: The court directed plaintiff Reshma Hari Apte to serve defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date, with threat of suit dismissal for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 87. The plaintiff was granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes including service on their advocates. Case adjourned to 30.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 16-Dec-2021

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case S/12/2026 Summary: The court directed plaintiff Reshma Hari Apte to serve defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date, with threat of suit dismissal for non-compliance under O.S. Rule 87. The plaintiff was granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes including service on their advocates. Case adjourned to 30.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case