Vishal Vaishnav Puri D M HARISH AND COMPANY vs Vaishnav Shorilal Puri — TP/2473/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020015472026

e-Filing Number

14-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/1547/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

TP/2473/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishal Vaishnav Puri D M HARISH AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vaishnav Shorilal Puri

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2473/2026 The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate and directed procedural compliance including issuance of citation and notice to the Collector. The petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office per Bombay High Court Rules 399-400. The court will verify if any cross-petition exists and place it before the bench if filed. The case is adjourned pending completion of all compliance formalities, with liberty to list for final grant thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2473/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2473/2026 The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate and directed procedural compliance including issuance of citation and notice to the Collector. The petitioner's advocate must file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office per Bombay High Court Rules 399-400. The court will verify if any cross-petition exists and place it before the bench if filed. The case is adjourned pending completion of all compliance formalities, with liberty to list for final grant thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case