TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs KATHA MEDIATIX INDIA LTD AND 3 ORS. — EXA/1291/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2016

CNR: HCBM020014072016

Filing Number

EXA/239/2016

Filing Date

18-Jan-2016

Registration No

EXA/1291/2016

Registration Date

28-Jun-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. LAW SQUARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KATHA MEDIATIX INDIA LTD AND 3 ORS.

  2. 2.KRISHNENDA P. SEN

  3. 3.ROMMER K. SEN

  4. 4.KAJAL K. SEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in consolidated cases involving Tata Capital Financial Services Limited against Katha Mediatix India Ltd and others, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2016

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 16-Jun-2016

    For Rejection [Original Side Matters]

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master

  5. 18-Jan-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1291/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in consolidated cases involving Tata Capital Financial Services Limited against Katha Mediatix India Ltd and others, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case