PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 vs INDIA MEDTRONIC PRIVATE LIMITED — IA/419/2024

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020013672024

e-Filing Number

15-01-2024

Filing Number

IA/1366/2024

Filing Date

15-Jan-2024

Registration No

IA/419/2024

Registration Date

03-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2

    Adv. N C MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDIA MEDTRONIC PRIVATE LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted an interim application by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 against India Medtronic Pvt. Ltd., extending the time to remove office objections by two weeks from April 15, 2026. The court took the application on board at the applicant's request and directed that the order be digitally signed and circulated via fax or email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    For Condonation Of Delay

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  5. 15-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/419/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted an interim application by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 against India Medtronic Pvt. Ltd., extending the time to remove office objections by two weeks from April 15, 2026. The court took the application on board at the applicant's request and directed that the order be digitally signed and circulated via fax or email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case