HAJRABI ABDUL GAFOOR ALIAS HAJRANI IBRAHIM vs AHMED HAJI IBRAHIM — S/204/2025
Case under Gift Tax Act 1958 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020012292025
Filing Number
S/1228/2025
Filing Date
14-Jan-2025
Registration No
S/204/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HAJRABI ABDUL GAFOOR ALIAS HAJRANI IBRAHIM
Adv. Suchita,PRAMILA PRAJAPATI,PRAMILA PRAJAPATI, PRAMILA PRAJAPATI
-
2.MEHRUNISHA MAHBOOB GHONE
-
3.AASIA IBRAHIM GODKE
-
4.RIYAZ AHMED NIZAMI
-
5.AYAZ AHMED NIZAMI MEHMOOD MIYA
-
6.RAHIMA HARUN SHAIKH
-
7.RIZWANA SARFARAZ SHAIKH
-
8.ARIFA RAFIQUE SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.AHMED HAJI IBRAHIM
-
2.OLYMPUS GROUP OF CONSTRUCTIONS
Adv. Chitnis Vaithy and Co
-
3.HARVINDERPAL MEHTA
Adv. Chitnis Vaithy and Co
-
4.TAMANJIT H. MEHTA
Adv. Chitnis Vaithy and Co
-
5.CHARANJIT H. MEHTA
Adv. Chitnis Vaithy and Co
-
6.TIMMY BUILDERS
Adv. Chitnis Vaithy and Co
-
7.DALJIT H. MEHTA
Adv. Chitnis Vaithy and Co
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Outcome Summary: The case (S/204/2025) was adjourned to 29.04.2026. The plaintiff is directed to serve the defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date; failure to comply will result in dismissal under O.S. Rule 87. The court granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes of service, including service upon their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
For Direction
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
16-Jul-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. S/204/2025
Case Outcome Summary: The case (S/204/2025) was adjourned to 29.04.2026. The plaintiff is directed to serve the defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an affidavit of service by the next date; failure to comply will result in dismissal under O.S. Rule 87. The court granted liberty to serve defendants through all modes of service, including service upon their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts