Rita Singh Chauhan vs Pushparani Prithviraj Singh (DECEASED) — TP/1459/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020010662025
e-Filing Number
12-01-2025
Filing Number
TP/1066/2025
Filing Date
13-Jan-2025
Registration No
TP/1459/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Judge
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Coram
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration with Will ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rita Singh Chauhan
Adv. DEEPAK SHARMA
-
2.Meenum Mohan
Adv. SHARMA DEEPAK MATAPRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pushparani Prithviraj Singh (DECEASED)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
For Hearing
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
11-Jun-2026
For Hearing
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
07-May-2026
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
In TP/1459/2025, the Testamentary Department granted the petitioner's request to dispense with re-verification of the amendment based on the petitioner's age, upon filing an additional affidavit confirming the proposed amendment. The case was adjourned to 10.08.2026, with the petitioner's advocate required to initial the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
12-Mar-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
03-Feb-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
16-Dec-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
17-Nov-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
For Amendment
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
17-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
06-Nov-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
10-Sep-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
31-Jul-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
19-Jun-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
For Direction
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
04-Apr-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TP/1459/2025
In TP/1459/2025, the Testamentary Department granted the petitioner's request to dispense with re-verification of the amendment based on the petitioner's age, upon filing an additional affidavit confirming the proposed amendment. The case was adjourned to 10.08.2026, with the petitioner's advocate required to initial the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts