Hamid Mohamed Farooq Kolsawala vs Mohammed Farooq Ali Mohammed Kolsawala alias Farooq A Kolsawala — TP/2223/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.

Next hearing 07-Aug-2026

CNR: HCBM020008502026

e-Filing Number

09-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/850/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

TP/2223/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hamid Mohamed Farooq Kolsawala

    Adv. ATHAR PAVASKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Farooq Ali Mohammed Kolsawala alias Farooq A Kolsawala

  2. 2.Rashida Banoo Mohd Farooq Kolsawala alias Rashida F Kolsawala

Case History

  1. 07-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Aug-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  3. 05-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2223/2026 The court directed the petitioner to issue citation within two weeks and comply with Rule 396 requirements by submitting true copies of Schedule-I to the Collector and portal. The petitioner must serve citations on non-consenting legal heirs, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420 within one week if other heirs exist, and ensure all Chapter XXVI BHC Rules requisitions are met. The case was adjourned to 07.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2223/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2223/2026 The court directed the petitioner to issue citation within two weeks and comply with Rule 396 requirements by submitting true copies of Schedule-I to the Collector and portal. The petitioner must serve citations on non-consenting legal heirs, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420 within one week if other heirs exist, and ensure all Chapter XXVI BHC Rules requisitions are met. The case was adjourned to 07.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case