Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co vs Zoya Herbocuticals — COMIP/21/2026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020007662026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

COMIP/766/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

COMIP/21/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section 1
Copyright Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Zoya Herbocuticals

  2. 2.Iretus Biotech Pvt Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: COMIP/21/2026 The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division granted a decree in favor of Hindustan Unilever Limited against Zoya Herbocuticals and Iretus Biotech Pvt Ltd on May 5, 2026, after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The court accepted the signed Consent Terms and decreed the suit in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), and (d) of the plaint, with court fees refunded per rules and the Court Receiver discharged with all associated costs to be paid by the plaintiff within 8 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COMIP/21/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COMIP/21/2026 The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division granted a decree in favor of Hindustan Unilever Limited against Zoya Herbocuticals and Iretus Biotech Pvt Ltd on May 5, 2026, after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The court accepted the signed Consent Terms and decreed the suit in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), and (d) of the plaint, with court fees refunded per rules and the Court Receiver discharged with all associated costs to be paid by the plaintiff within 8 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case