ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING WORKERS J. M. DSILVA vs METAL BOX INDIA LIMITED — RPW/4/2026

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Mar-2026

CNR: HCBM020006962026

Filing Number

RPW/696/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

RPW/4/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING WORKERS J. M. DSILVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.METAL BOX INDIA LIMITED

  2. 2.VINOD KRISHNA, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

  3. 3.WALTER SANTIS

    Adv. Sonia Walter Santis

  4. 4.SABASTINE DANTAS

  5. 5.IGNATIOIS L MASCARENHAS (SINCE DECEASED)

  6. 6.JAGANNATH K. SUVARNA (SINCE DECEASED)

  7. 7.BALU BHAU GAIKWAD (SINCE DECEASED)

  8. 8.ARUN KACHARE

    Adv. Sonia Walter Santis

  9. 9.ABDUL MALIK (SINCE DECEASED)

  10. 10.VENKATESH G. MUDALIAR (SINCE DECEASED)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court rejected the Association of Engineering Workers' review petition challenging an order that granted relief to only two workers instead of the 500 workers on whose behalf the complaint was allegedly filed. The court held that it cannot reconsider its own factual finding that the complaint was filed for only eight workers under the guise of review jurisdiction, as no error apparent on the record was identified and the petition amounted to a disguised appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. RPW/4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court rejected the Association of Engineering Workers' review petition challenging an order that granted relief to only two workers instead of the 500 workers on whose behalf the complaint was allegedly filed. The court held that it cannot reconsider its own factual finding that the complaint was filed for only eight workers under the guise of review jurisdiction, as no error apparent on the record was identified and the petition amounted to a disguised appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case