Rutesh Prakash Joshi vs PRAKASH MURLIDHAR JOSHI — TP/2034/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020005342026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/534/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

TP/2034/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rutesh Prakash Joshi

    Adv. B G Saraf

  2. 2.ASHISH PRAKASH JOSHI

    Adv. SARAF BHALCHANDRA GOVIND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH MURLIDHAR JOSHI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2034/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Rutesh Prakash Joshi and Ashish Prakash Joshi against Prakash Murlidhar Joshi was called for directions on 23rd April, 2026. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate was instructed to effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office and file an affidavit of service. The matter was adjourned pending completion of compliance formalities and verification of any cross-petitions, with liberty granted to list the case for final hearing once ready. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2034/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2034/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Rutesh Prakash Joshi and Ashish Prakash Joshi against Prakash Murlidhar Joshi was called for directions on 23rd April, 2026. The court directed the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, and the petitioner's advocate was instructed to effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office and file an affidavit of service. The matter was adjourned pending completion of compliance formalities and verification of any cross-petitions, with liberty granted to list the case for final hearing once ready. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case