BHAVESH PREMJI CHOTHANI vs SLUM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SRA AND 4 ORS. — WP/649/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020004682026
Filing Number
WP/468/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
WP/649/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAVESH PREMJI CHOTHANI
Adv. G CHANDRASEKAR GANAPATHYRAMAN
Respondent(s)
SLUM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SRA AND 4 ORS.
DEPUTY COLLECTOR SPECIAL DEPARTMENT SRA
MALAD POLICE STATION THROUGH SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR
KARTIK SRA CO OPERATIVE HSG. SOC. THORUGH CHAIRMAN
ORIENTAL HOTEL MANAGEMENT AND ESTATE PVT. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-02-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 17-02-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 16-02-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Bhavesh Premji Chothani against the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, finding that the petitioner failed to challenge the underlying April 30, 2024 order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC), which was the proper remedy. The court disposed of the petition without expressing any opinion on merits but granted liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings directly challenging the AGRC's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Bhavesh Premji Chothani against the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, finding that the petitioner failed to challenge the underlying April 30, 2024 order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC), which was the proper remedy. The court disposed of the petition without expressing any opinion on merits but granted liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings directly challenging the AGRC's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts