BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED vs UNITED STEEL CORPORATION — EXA/435/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020002972024

Filing Number

EXA/297/2024

Filing Date

03-Jan-2024

Registration No

EXA/435/2024

Registration Date

13-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. D V NAWADKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNITED STEEL CORPORATION

  2. 2.RAKESH R SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of principles established by the Supreme Court in *Bhadra International*. The court dismissed all execution applications and connected interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 03-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/435/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of principles established by the Supreme Court in *Bhadra International*. The court dismissed all execution applications and connected interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case