ROCHAK KOHLI ANJESH PANDIT AND CO vs COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX and Ors — HCBM20001972025

Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 14,19(1)(g)and21. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020001972025

e-Filing Number

03-01-2025

Filing Number

WP/197/2025

Filing Date

03-Jan-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED U/S 986

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section 14,19(1)(g)and21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROCHAK KOHLI ANJESH PANDIT AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX and Ors

  2. 2.State Tax Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on multiple petitions (including one involving Rochak Kohli Anjesh Pandit and Co. against the Commissioner of State Tax) giving petitioners a final four-week opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered and numbered by filing compliance documents. Failure to comply would result in automatic rejection of the petitions under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 03-Jan-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on multiple petitions (including one involving Rochak Kohli Anjesh Pandit and Co. against the Commissioner of State Tax) giving petitioners a final four-week opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered and numbered by filing compliance documents. Failure to comply would result in automatic rejection of the petitions under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case