JAMAL AHMED MOHMMED SAMI KHAN AND ANR. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 4 ORS. — WP/371/2022

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020001972022

Filing Number

WP/196/2022

Filing Date

04-Jan-2022

Registration No

WP/371/2022

Registration Date

19-Jan-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

Slum areas ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAMAL AHMED MOHMMED SAMI KHAN AND ANR.

    Adv. Archana Pandharinath Gaikwad

  2. 2.ASHFAQUE KHAN IDREES KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 4 ORS.

  2. 2.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

  3. 3.MCGM

  4. 4.AASIANA TENANT CHS

  5. 5.NAN ENTERPRISES

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    On 15th June 2026, the Bombay High Court adjourned WP/371/2022 with no representation for the petitioner. The petition was listed for 17th June 2026 under the caption "for dismissal," indicating the court's intent to dismiss the writ petition due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of legal representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/371/2022

casestatus.in Summary

On 15th June 2026, the Bombay High Court adjourned WP/371/2022 with no representation for the petitioner. The petition was listed for 17th June 2026 under the caption "for dismissal," indicating the court's intent to dismiss the writ petition due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of legal representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case