HDFC BANK LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL MANAGER NILAM HEMANT MEHTA vs ABDUL AHAD KHAN(BORROWER) — EXA/32/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020000682023
Filing Number
EXA/68/2023
Filing Date
02-Jan-2023
Registration No
EXA/32/2023
Registration Date
11-Jan-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HDFC BANK LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL MANAGER NILAM HEMANT MEHTA
Adv. Meghana M Murudkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABDUL AHAD KHAN(BORROWER)
-
2.SAIDAKHATOON ABDUL KALAM(CO-APPLICANT)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications in these consolidated cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of law. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India, the court held unilateral arbitrator appointments void ab initio and set aside all resulting arbitral awards. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
02-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/32/2023
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications in these consolidated cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of law. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International v. Airports Authority of India, the court held unilateral arbitrator appointments void ab initio and set aside all resulting arbitral awards. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts