PREMAL AVINASH PARIKH(Legal Heir) vs Sushilaben Rasiklal Parikh alias Sushila Rasiklal Parikh — TP/5764/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020000152025

e-Filing Number

31-12-2024

Filing Number

TP/15/2025

Filing Date

01-Jan-2025

Registration No

TP/5764/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREMAL AVINASH PARIKH(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Divya M Chopra Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sushilaben Rasiklal Parikh alias Sushila Rasiklal Parikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Premal Avinash Parikh's testamentary petition seeking Letters of Administration for the deceased Sushilaben Rasiklal Parikh's property and assets. The court found that all office objections had been satisfied and consents from all legal heirs were provided, removing impediments to the grant. The Department was directed to issue Letters of Administration within two weeks of resolving any remaining objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    For Compliance

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    For Direction

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  17. 08-May-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  19. 04-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 01-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/5764/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Premal Avinash Parikh's testamentary petition seeking Letters of Administration for the deceased Sushilaben Rasiklal Parikh's property and assets. The court found that all office objections had been satisfied and consents from all legal heirs were provided, removing impediments to the grant. The Department was directed to issue Letters of Administration within two weeks of resolving any remaining objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case