MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs VILAS SAHADU UBHE AND ORS. Advocate - P H Potnis — IA/1227/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010673652025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/41341/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

IA/1227/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 54

Petitioner(s)

MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Adv. Aparna Dharmaraj Vhatkar

Respondent(s)

VILAS SAHADU UBHE AND ORS. Advocate - P H Potnis

DILIP SAHADU UBHE

Adv. P H Potnis

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO.6, PUNE

THE COLLECTOR,PUNE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

23-04-2026

-DUE ADMISSION

25-03-2026

-DUE ADMISSION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Case Summary: IA/1227/2026 The Bombay High Court condoned Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation's one-year, 107-day delay in filing an appeal against an enhanced land acquisition compensation order. The court permitted the execution court's withdrawal orders to proceed undisturbed but stayed further execution proceedings, noting the appellant had already deposited the full decretal amount with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/1227/2026 The Bombay High Court condoned Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation's one-year, 107-day delay in filing an appeal against an enhanced land acquisition compensation order. The court permitted the execution court's withdrawal orders to proceed undisturbed but stayed further execution proceedings, noting the appellant had already deposited the full decretal amount with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case