REALM PROPERTIES PVT LTD THROU. ITS DIRECTOR ASHWIN DAMANI vs THE PANVEL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROU.ITS SUPEDT — WP/1403/2026

Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010672352025

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

WP/41251/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

WP/1403/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

REALM PROPERTIES PVT LTD THROU. ITS DIRECTOR ASHWIN DAMANI

Adv. Gargi U Warunjikar

Respondent(s)

THE PANVEL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROU.ITS SUPEDT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

03-02-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

02-07-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

06-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

07-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

10-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

The case WP/1403/2026 (Realm Properties Pvt Ltd v. Panvel Municipal Corporation) could not be heard on 6th May 2026 due to paucity of time. The court adjourned the matter for future listing, directing removal of office objections within two weeks and requiring the petitioner to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 14 days, failing which the case would be dismissed against unserved respondents. Any interim orders granted earlier would continue pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case WP/1403/2026 (Realm Properties Pvt Ltd v. Panvel Municipal Corporation) could not be heard on 6th May 2026 due to paucity of time. The court adjourned the matter for future listing, directing removal of office objections within two weeks and requiring the petitioner to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 14 days, failing which the case would be dismissed against unserved respondents. Any interim orders granted earlier would continue pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case