JALINDAR CHANGDEO GODASE vs BHALERAO DATTATRAYA BABAN AND ANR — APL/1660/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010671812025

Filing Number

APL/26496/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

APL/1660/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Seeking Directions ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
The Fertilizer (Control) Order 1985 Section 19a,b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JALINDAR CHANGDEO GODASE

    Adv. KRISHNAMURTHY AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHALERAO DATTATRAYA BABAN AND ANR

  2. 2.SHIVLAL PANNALAL MUTHIYAN

  3. 3.MACCHINDRA RAMCHANDRA BHOR

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the criminal appellate application to 2nd July 2026. The applicant's counsel noted the complainant's non-appearance before the Magistrate, while the APP sought time for instructions. The applicant was exempted from personal appearance before the Magistrate in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/1660/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the criminal appellate application to 2nd July 2026. The applicant's counsel noted the complainant's non-appearance before the Magistrate, while the APP sought time for instructions. The applicant was exempted from personal appearance before the Magistrate in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case