GOLDEN JUBILEE TECHNICAL INSTITUTE vs MR. SHAIKH AHMED HUSAIN AND ORS — IA/303/2026

Case under School Tribunal Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010669412025

Filing Number

IA/41045/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

IA/303/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

School Tribunal Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOLDEN JUBILEE TECHNICAL INSTITUTE

    Adv. Adv Manjiri Parasnis

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. SHAIKH AHMED HUSAIN AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Golden Jubilee Education Trust's interim application to recall the April 30, 2024 dismissal order that had struck down their writ petition for failure to remove office objections. The court found the dismissal was caused by advocate default rather than litigant fault, and restored the petition on condition of paying Rs. 10,000 costs to Kirtikar Library and removing office objections within two weeks, with the matter listed for hearing on April 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Golden Jubilee Education Trust's interim application to recall the April 30, 2024 dismissal order that had struck down their writ petition for failure to remove office objections. The court found the dismissal was caused by advocate default rather than litigant fault, and restored the petition on condition of paying Rs. 10,000 costs to Kirtikar Library and removing office objections within two weeks, with the matter listed for hearing on April 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case